Now finally the world will get to hear my thoughts on all the things that matter, like my opinions on books that i'm reading and movies that i've seen lately, because it seems like there is a serious gap in the market when it comes to that kind of thing, and i'm just the man to cram that hole in the culture with my mind juices.
So I saw No Country For Old Men and let me say it was no movie for young men who still have an active interest in engaging with life. I realise that it's not much of a pun but read on because it has significance....the circle of life my friend.
It's the latest much-hyped movie from the Coen Brothers who i've been a fan of for a few years now. As a 10 year old kid I saw Raising Arizona and liked it a lot and then I thought Millers Crossing was a really great movie about a hat but they first burnt an impression onto me with Barton Fink. I saw it when I was 14 and it was the first truly mind-bending movie that I ever experienced. The story is basically about a mildly successful neurotic New York playwright who is given a job writing for the movies in Hollywood. He ends up writing scripts for B-Grade wrestling movies (basically like porn with pretentions) and starts to dissolve mentally under the pain of loneliness and compromise which culminates in him becoming friends with a psychotic serial killer (though why use the adjective psychotic, is there a possibility that there's a type of serial killer who isn't psycotic?).
It shook my fragile developing teenage mind.
I hadn't until that point realised that movies could be so insane and scarring, with the possible exception of when I was 11 and my parents had hired Robocop for me without realising it was an R rated movie and because they had already paid for it and weren't that interested in it themselves they let me watch it. The funniest memory I have about that is that they watched it with me and let me see every violent scene but made me cover my eyes during the one sex scene. I realise now that my parents were practising a form of censorship that is very popular in the United States. Anyway I digress.....
After Barton Fink I was a major Coen's fan! They've made so many great movies over the years and this was supposed to be there masterpiece, the one they're tipped to win the Oscar for. I should have been able to love it, it was somewhat incoherent like Barton Fink and like Fink and that other great movie of my childhood Robocop it features excessive violence and a despicable serial killing villain. This should have been a homecoming for me, but sadly it wasn't.
In brief it's about a hunter who finds two million dollars and a large quantity of heroin that's been abandoned after a drug deal that's turned bad. The hunter then you see(yes I know but I didn't write it) the hunter becomes the hunted. Hunted by one of the most f$%#ed up villains ever seen in a movie, who he then becomes a hunted hunter by a policeman who, well basically is trying to hunt down also the first hunter who then became the hunted .
If I had produced this thing i would have insisted on calling it 'The Hunting', but I didn't produce it so there you go.
I had a problem with the movie that I couldn't quite put my finger on, though why I would want to touch problems with my finger seems a little strange to me. The acting was good, the cinematography was beautiful, they has eskewed commercial pandering and had created a movie that genuinely attempted to look into the darkest corner of mans heart and come out with some truths that can unsettle someone who's on shaky ground. They captured the senselessness of tragedy and violence, but I remained singularly unimpressed. I had to look into a part of my own dark heart in a way that wasn't emo and come to a realisation.
The problem lay with me as a viewer. Sadly im not that early pubescent boy who can have his mind easily warped by almost incoherent art house movies that take a look into the dark hearts of men. I've seen that movie a few times now. It's kind of saddening for me to admit it to myself but on some level i've outgrown the search for truth in fiction. Now in order for me to stay engaged I have to look for truth in non-fiction, be it in book form or more profoundly be it in life itself, the world around me, which is more messier and incoherent than any art house film could hope to be. The actings often not as good as a Coen Brothers movie and the violence and the tragedy is a whole lot more horrifying to experience, but the thing is (and here comes the moral like all the good commercial movies have) it's a more meaningful and worthwhile experience.
In living the movie of my life I think I want mine to become a lot more commercial. I want to fight for what I want and face obstacles that mean I may lose, I want the good to outshine the evil, I want the love story to win out and I want to have grown more character bye the time the adventure comes to an end. I want my life to be a lot more romantic comedy and a lot less Robofink with a depressing ending.
And most importantly of all I want it to all take place within 90 minutes, or 102 minutes if it's the special directors cut because I have the attention span of a 5 year old and i'm okay with that.
Having said that the Coen's have got a new movie in post production with George Clooney and Brad Pitt starring and it sound awesome. I've got a feeling it might just be one of the best movies ever made......
Also I have to add that even though I don't want my life to be Robofink there really is no way of expressing how awesome that movie is inside my head.
The End.
14 comments:
Great post GLynn, i feel privileged to be the first ever comment. So i see you are just as much a censor as your parents or the USA, lol. 'most f$%#ed up villains ever seen in a movie' if those dollar and percentage symbos weren't there i swear i would have been offended. I've been wanting to follow a new blog for awhile, i look forward to many posts. I hope you manage to get past the newbie six-post burnout, where most blogs usually quagmire and then die (forsythe) and reach for the lofty heights of your 176th post... oh and one tip, alcohol and blogging don't mix, unless you want to wake up feeling huge amounts of regret. And what's with the word verication and no annoynymous thing for posting a comment, censorship man!! censorship. It means only people with a google account can comment.
Hola! I´m the guy from the strange streets blog. I see you started a new blog and wanted to show some support. Just do your thing and have some patience if you do not see inmediate results. These things grow slowly...Good luck!
Dear Glyn,
You saw No Country for Old Men without me. I am
a) Pissed off at you
b) Relieved, because i think i would become quietly obsessed with it and offended by the fact that you were unimpressed
c) Going to see the Darjeeling Limited with my Dad
d) All of the above.
Turn your screen upside down to view answer.
TIP: Dont turn screen - real answer = D.
Keep up your blog please.
Shmez.
Well my darlin' you write with a committment and truth that made me want to go and see the 'incoherent art house film' just so I could see it for myself.
I don't think I have enough pop-culture refernce to be able to leave a smart and witty comment but all the same I'm diggin' the bloggin'. Please keep doing this!
Hey, check you out. A movie review -> only this time it's on your terms!
*sam cheers*
Keep it real G
Hey Miss Sam,
Thankyou for your comment, I really wanted you to read my blog and like it.
Yeah it feels better not to have to worry about whether or not what I want to write fits into the vibe of some online magazine.
Cheers Sweetheart
I think my favourite bit was when you said you would rather find truth in non-fiction... be it in a book, or in life herself, complete with all of her misgivings....
Where ever did that come from Missure Glyn?
(Is it okay to spell like crap on these things?)
Hey G,
Word up broheme.
I still remember the day after you first saw fink and you came round and made me feel like I had missed out on the greatest film experience of all time by not watching that movie. You bastard.
I was actually really looking forward to seeing this one. It's got such big raps, ya know. But it's so hard getting inspired to invest time in watching some film these days, I think you may have talked me out of it. You bastard.
So are you looking forward to being equally disappointed in There Will Be Blood..?
Sam- I think you have some idea where that would come from :o) - Don't worry about the spelling
Adam - lol! Yeah I am looking forward to being equally disappointed by There Will Be Blood.
I thought it was a well produced blog post although not all that enjoyable with a disappointing ending where i wasn't really listening to Tommy Lee Jones last speech about his dad because i didn't know it was going to be important. Sorry. I started thinking about No Country for Old Men.
I'm of the belief that its best to leave the audience wanting more when it comes to blog posts. More like Seinfeld than Simpsons.
Forsyth (no e)
Hey Simmo,
So by leaving them wanting more you mean not writing things for months and years on end? :o)
Interesting strategy.
glynn, i'm waiting for the next post... what's going on... I'm hoping you're not employing forsyth's strategy of less is more, because that is B.S in the world of blogging, you need at least one post a week, to keep everyone into it. I need a fix man. I need to hear Glynn's spin on the passing of Roy Shcneider from Jaws... you'll find that in any major event, your readers will definately look to you for an opinion, i don't know what i'm taking about, i'm drunk , okay, i've had lots of beams , and i'm drunk. Seacrest Out...
I agree with danielinamerica. Where's the next article? Enquiring minds want to know your opinion on all things irrelevant. It's quantity not quality that matters on the interweb.
Does anyone remember that underwater version of star trek that roy used to be in? It was called seaquest or somesuch. So bizarre, I swear, I think of that show and I feel stoned.
I too am disappointed by your blog. It hasnt changed since i last saw it. I'm not going to abuse you. This time.
Hey Glyn,
Sorry it took so long to get to this - busy at work (those kickbacks aren't going to find themselves!).
Anyhow, I was interested to read that you find your search for truth has led you to non-fiction. I've never really been much of a fiction man myself - I find the occasional fictional book or movie OK as a piece of escapist entertainment, but I rarely get more than that out of it. And as I don't have any great yearning for escapism, I rarely find myself seeking out fiction. There have been some exceptions - political novels like Darkness at Noon, and 1984, which really helped me understand some ideas, but such experiences are rare. I was having this very conversation with Tam the other day - I was saying that I find documentaries on TV far more interesting than any story someone has made up. Good doco's are intrinsically amazing & there's no need to suspend disbelief. The search for truth through fiction is a very indirect and hit & miss project. Metaphors and aesthetics are great, and when done well in art can be appreciated for their own artistic value. But if it is truth you seek, best to take a path which is not convoluted, nor clouded in artistic obscurity. Logic and reason - the only tools we have!
Post a Comment